| Uses of Detection Devices in Speeding Offenses |
|
| In a prosecution for speeding, the prosecutor has the burden of proving each and every element of the case by competent and credible evidence. Normally, the proof will be obtained by the prosecutor from the testimony of the officer. The basic testimony will convey a visual observation or independent estimate of speed made by the officer, corroborated by a calibrated speedometer reading or calibrated radar unit readout. There are essentially five ways for law enforcement officers to determine speed: (1) pacing the motorist's vehicle with the officer's patrol car; (2) obtaining a time-distance measurement with manually activated time; (3) obtaining a time-distance measurement with automatically activated time distance devices; (4) radar; and (5) laser devices. More... |
|
|
| Reckless Driving Violations |
|
| A person commits the offense of reckless driving if the person drives a vehicle in willful or wanton disregard for the safety of people or property. The phrase "willful and wanton" means that the motorist showed deliberate and conscious indifference to the safety of others. The essence of reckless driving lies in the manner and circumstances of the vehicle's operation, not merely in the act of operating a vehicle. More... |
|
|
| Penalties for OUI/OWI (Operating Under the Influence or While Intoxicated) |
|
| The penalties imposed by states for operating while intoxicated (OWI) and operating under the influence (OUI) follow the same pattern of penalties imposed by states enforcing laws for driving under the influence (DUI) and/or driving while intoxicated (DWI). In general, all states and the District of Columbia have "per se" laws defining it as a crime to drive with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) at or above a proscribed level of 0.08. percent and above. More... |
|
|
| Breathalyzer versus Blood Tests in Drunk Driving Cases |
|
| The most frequently used test in drunk driving cases is the breath test, or Breathalyzer test. The breath test is used more frequently that urine or blood tests to test for the blood alcohol level because it is less intrusive and the apparatus is easily portable and convenient to use, even in the field. Because blood tests are universally relied upon as stronger evidence than breath tests, the prosecution will seek it whenever it can. In many states, a blood test may only be administered in cases involving death or serious bodily injury, or when the motorist required medical treatment and the administration of a breath or urine test was impractical or impossible. ¤Although a motorist may refuse this test, the refusal is usually admissible in evidence against the motorist at the administrative or judicial hearing.
More... |
|
|
| Defendant's Right to Counsel Before Consenting to Chemical Test in Drunk Driving Case |
|
| Most people are aware that Miranda warnings must be given an accused before he or she is subjected to custodial interrogation. The warnings are intended to protect the privilege against self-incrimination, and the Fifth Amendment right to counsel was created to protect that privilege. However, if the privilege against self-incrimination is not implicated, the warnings are not required, and there is no right to counsel. The United States Supreme Court has held that "physical" evidence may be obtained from an accused without running afoul of the privilege. Therefore, the right to counsel privilege has been held inapplicable to physical or performance tests and chemical tests of bodily substances. More... |
|
|